Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
176 - 200 of 12,949 collection items
FR Regulations & Notices

DHS Final Rule on Application of Certain Mandatory Bars in Fear Screenings

DHS final rule amending its regulations to allow asylum officers to consider the potential application of certain bars to asylum and statutory withholding of removal during credible fear and reasonable fear screenings. Rule is effective 1/17/25. (89 FR 103370, 12/18/24)

12/18/24 AILA Doc. No. 24121703. Admissions & Border, Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Holds It Lacks Jurisdiction to Consider Petitioner’s Waiver of Inadmissibility under INA §212(h)

The court held it was not permitted to review the BIA’s denial of petitioner’s inadmissibility waiver application, concluding that the BIA need not make an extreme hardship finding to deny an inadmissibility waiver application on discretionary grounds. (Salomon-Guillen v. Garland, 12/18/24)

12/18/24 AILA Doc. No. 25010242. Prosecutorial Discretion, Removal & Relief, Waivers
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Finds Petitioner’s NOH Gave Sufficient Notice under Recent Supreme Court Precedent

The court granted the government’s petition for rehearing in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Campos-Chaves v. Garland, and found that the Notice of Hearing (NOH) had provided the petitioner with the notice required under INA §240(a)(2)(A). (Luna v. Garland, 12/17/24)

12/17/24 AILA Doc. No. 25010243. Ethics, Prosecutorial Discretion, Removal & Relief
Agency Memos & Announcements

USCIS Provides Updated Instructions for Submitting Certain Applications in Immigration Court and for Providing Biometrics and Biographic Information

USCIS updated its instructions for submitting certain applications in immigration court and for providing biometrics and biometric information to USCIS, noting that the instructions provide that I-589 applicants will no longer need to mail USCIS information to complete their biometrics collection.

12/16/24 AILA Doc. No. 24121700. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds That Circumstance-Specific Approach Applies to INA §101(a)(43)(D)’s $10,000 Threshold for Money Laundering Offenses

The BIA held that, in assessing whether an offense constitutes a money laundering aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(D), the circumstance-specific approach applies to the requirement that the “amount of the funds exceeded $10,000.” Matter of Dominguez Reyes, 28 I&N Dec. 878 (BIA 2024)

12/13/24 AILA Doc. No. 24121600. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Finds Multiple Inconsistencies and Omissions in Record Supported IJ’s Adverse Credibility Determination as to Congolese Petitioner

The court held that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s denial of asylum, where the BIA had expressly discussed four inconsistencies and omissions in comparing petitioner’s declaration, application, documentary evidence, and testimony before the IJ. (Mondzali Bopaka v. Garland, 12/13/24)

12/13/24 AILA Doc. No. 25010241. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Holds That Conviction for Third-Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct in Minnesota Is Not Categorically a Rape Aggravated Felony

The court held that a conviction for third-degree criminal sexual conduct in Minnesota was not categorically an aggravated felony, and noted “deference to the Board … is now a relic of the past” due to the Supreme Court’s Loper Bright decision. (Quito-Guachichulca v. Garland, 12/9/24)

12/9/24 AILA Doc. No. 24121102. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Congressional Updates, AILA Public Statements

AILA Submits Statement for Senate Hearing on Mass Deportations

AILA submits a statement for the record for the 12/10/24 Senate hearing on mass deportation, "How Mass Deportations Will Separate American Families, Harm Our Armed Forces, and Devastate Our Economy."

12/9/24 AILA Doc. No. 24120939. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Finds BIA Erred in Concluding Salvadoran Petitioner’s Asylum Claim Was Untimely

The court found that the BIA erred in rejecting the Salvadoran petitioner’s contention that he had satisfied the changed circumstances exception to the one-year deadline for filing an asylum application based on the development of his mental health issues. (Escobar Larin v. Garland, 12/5/24)

12/5/24 AILA Doc. No. 24120937. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: Advocating for Clients in ICE's Alternatives to Detention Programs

AILA, AMICA Center for Immigrant Rights, and Just Futures Law provide a comprehensive resource for requesting changes to a client’s reporting and technology requirements enrolled in ICE’s Alternatives to Detentions program, including federal litigation options.

12/2/24 AILA Doc. No. 24120237. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Pointer: Recognizing Matter of Fernandes Issue, How and When to Raise It, and Other Considerations

AILA’s Removal Defense Section updates its practice pointer on Matter of Fernandes and considerations an attorney should keep in mind when raising an objection pursuant to Fernandes.

12/2/24 AILA Doc. No. 23121300. Removal & Relief
Liaison Minutes

AILA Meets with USCIS to Discuss Technology, Policy, and Adjudication Updates

AILA's Liaison Committee will meet with USCIS in December 2024 to discuss family nad humanitarian applications and related processing, lockbox operations, and FY2026 H-1B cap registrations. Read the agenda.

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Strikes Down Executive Order That Prohibited FBOs from Servicing ICE Charter Flights at Seattle Airport

The court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the United States, concluding that a King County Executive Order (EO) prohibiting fixed base operators (FBOs) from operating ICE charter flights at Boeing Field was unconstitutional. (United States v. King County, 11/29/24)

11/29/24 AILA Doc. No. 24120941. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Upholds BIA’s Conclusion That Petitioner’s Challenge to IJ’s Particularly Serious Crime Ruling Was Waived

The court upheld the BIA’s conclusion that the petitioner, who had been convicted in Maryland of an identity fraud offense, had not properly challenged the IJ’s determination that he had been convicted of a particularly serious crime barring asylum. (Lamine Kouyate v. Garland, 11/27/24)

11/27/24 AILA Doc. No. 24120402. Asylum, Crimes, Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Pointer: Filing Administrative Complaints and Requesting Investigations on Behalf of Detainees

AILA provides a practice pointer on how to file an administrative complaint with DHS on behalf of detained and formerly detained noncitizens.

11/25/24 AILA Doc. No. 24112500. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Pointer: DOJ Regulations on Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings

AILA's EOIR Committee provides a practice pointer on DOJ regulations that codified the ability of EOIR adjudicators to administratively close and terminate removal proceedings when certain standards are met.

11/22/24 AILA Doc. No. 24112200. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Finds BIA Erred in Determining Record Evidence Was Insufficient to Establish Equitable Tolling

The court concluded that the BIA applied the incorrect legal standard, overlooked certain evidence, and departed from its precedent in determining that the petitioner was not entitled to equitable tolling of the deadline for her appeal to the BIA. (Diaz-Valdez v. Garland, 11/22/24)

11/22/24 AILA Doc. No. 24120401. Removal & Relief
Featured Issues

Featured Issue: ICE’s Alternatives to Detention Program

This page explains ICE's ATD program, which monitors up to 376,000 non-detained individuals.

11/21/24 AILA Doc. No. 24112102. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
AILA Blog

Think Immigration: A New Resource for Effective Immigration Court Advocacy

In this blog post, authors Michelle Méndez and Victoria Neilson discuss AILA’s newest book on trial skills and how it can help lawyers prepare and succeed in immigration court proceedings.

11/21/24 AILA Doc. No. 24112100. Removal & Relief
Liaison Minutes

AILA's ICE Liaison Committee Meets with ICE

AILA’s ICE Liaison Committee will meet with ICE on November 21, 2024, to discuss topics related to NTA guidance, the CARECEN settlement, admin closure, transfer of detained clients, confiscation and return of original documents, and more. Read the full agenda and key takeaways.

Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA Submits Amicus Urging En Banc Rehearing on Issue of the Phrase "Single Scheme"

AILA submitted an amicus to the Ninth Circuit urging rehearing en banc on the issue of the phrase "single scheme" and addressing the appropriate standard for a three-judge panel to apply when deciding whether it is bound by circuit precedent that relied on Chevron after Loper Bright.

11/20/24 AILA Doc. No. 24112600. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

EOIR 60-Day Notice and Comment Request on Form EOIR-40

EOIR 60-day notice and comment request on Form EOIR-40, Application for Suspension of Deportation. Comments are due 1/21/25. (89 FR 91786, 11/20/24)

11/20/24 AILA Doc. No. 25013006. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds That Matter of Fernandes Applies Retroactively

The BIA held that Matter of Fernandes’s holding that an objection to a noncompliant Notice to Appear (NTA) will generally be considered timely if raised prior to close of pleadings is not a change in law. Matter of Larios-Gutierrez de Pablo and Pablo-Larios, 28 I&N Dec. 868 (BIA 2024)

11/19/24 AILA Doc. No. 24112101. Removal & Relief
AILA Blog

Think Immigration: Children Should Not Face Immigration Court Alone

AILA Law Student Member Magdalena López Murphy explains the high stakes for children facing removal or deportation proceedings and the bipartisan effort to establish a children’s court within EOIR to ensure children have fair access to protections and obtain legal representation.

11/19/24 Removal & Relief
Agency Memos & Announcements

DHS Conducts Removal Flight to the People’s Republic of China

On 11/16/24, DHS, through ICE, conducted a charter removal flight to China, returning Chinese nationals without legal status in the U.S. This action underscores ongoing international cooperation to enforce immigration laws, curb smuggling, and reduce irregular migration.

11/18/24 AILA Doc. No. 24112508. Removal & Relief